California High-Speed Rail: Where It Stands, Why It’s Struggling, and What Critics—Including Michael Mick Webster reporting Allege
California’s High-Speed Rail (HSR) has inched forward while skepticism has surged. Fresh reporting in 2025 spotlights fixed safety reporting with management have all
There’s snouts are in the public money trough. Investigative congressional probes, threatened federal funding cuts, and still-rising costs. Support among Californians persists in principle, but belief in eventual completion remains low. Meanwhile, longtime critics—among them syndicated investigative reporter Michael (Mick) Webster—argue the project suffers from chronic mismanagement, ballooning expenses, and safety culture gaps. Los Angeles TimesNew York PostPolitico
What’s new in 2025
- Congressional scrutiny intensifies. A bipartisan House committee is investigating whether the Authority misrepresented projections and finances to secure federal money. Los Angeles Times
- Federal funding at risk. A federal review this summer criticized missed deadlines and cost overruns; additional grant dollars—reportedly up to $4B—were threatened unless corrective steps were shown. (State leaders dispute the findings and say progress continues.) New York Post
- Public sentiment: supportive ideals, shaky confidence. A new poll shows 62% of California voters support continuing HSR, yet only about a quarter believe it will actually be finished. Politico
- “Progress” headlines vs. credibility gap. Even milestone announcements are framed against years of delays and cost inflation. Newsweek
Cost, scope, and delays—core points of contention
- Budget escalation. Estimates have climbed from roughly $33B at conception to well over $100B today (recent tallies often cite ~$128B), while the project focus has narrowed to the Merced–Bakersfield starter segment. New York Post
- Schedule slippage. Initial completion targets are long past; a Central Valley segment is discussed into the 2030s, with no firm end-to-end date publicly locked. Politico
- Funding path still unsettled. New leadership has floated a blend of cap-and-trade revenues and private investment/PPPs to finish the starter line and attract capital over time—promising, but politically and financially unproven without a revised, credible plan. San Francisco Chronicle
Safety, governance, and accountability criticisms
- Safety culture concerns. Posts and commentary circulating in local media and social platforms call out “safety lacking” and urge a more transparent, accountable safety culture within or around the program. Facebook
- Management and oversight. Editorial voices and watchdog-style columns describe HSR as a “boondoggle,” citing change-order volume, procurement delays, and planning churn as signals of weak program controls. (CHSRA contests these portrayals.) Las Vegas Review-JournalNew York Post
Michael (Mick) Webster’s critiques
Webster—writing in his worldwide syndicated column and related posts—has argued for years that the Authority faces a “safety and financial fiasco,”pointing to alleged gaps in safety management, transparency, and fiscal stewardship. Key threads in his work include:
- Systemic safety shortfalls. Calls for a rigorous, transparent safety culture to protect workers and the public. Facebook
- False and manipulated safety reports
- Financial mismanagement and waste. Assertions that persistent overruns and schedule resets reflect deeper governance failures. renewamerica.comrenewamerica.com
Representative items:
- “Safety and financial fiasco haunts California High Speed Rail Authority (HSR)” (column; March 14, 2023). renewamerica.com by Michael Mick Webster
- Social post: “California high-speed rail Authority. Safety lacking…” (Laguna Journal page). Facebook by Michael Mick Webster
Counter-narrative from supporters
- Economic development & climate goals. Proponents stress long-term regional growth, cleaner intercity travel, and job creation, arguing cancellation would strand sunk costs and forfeit federal/state momentum. San Francisco Chronicle
- Political commitment. California leadership continues to frame HSR as a generational project that is “becoming a reality,” despite Washington-level headwinds. Facebook
What to watch next
- Outcome of congressional probes and any conditions attached to future federal funds. Los Angeles TimesNew York Post
- Revised business plan & funding stack, including cap-and-trade allocations beyond 2030 and real PPP commitments. San Francisco Chronicle
- On-the-ground deliverables: track-laying starts, segment commissioning dates, change-order discipline, and safety program transparency. New York Post
Sources & further reading (selected)
- Polling & public sentiment: Politico/Citrin Center/Possibility Lab poll (Aug. 22, 2025). Politico
- Federal funding dispute & milestones context: Newsweek; New York Post summary of a federal review; CHSRA/state responses. NewsweekNew York Post
- Congressional investigation coverage: Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times
- Financing path & leadership plan: San Francisco Chronicle (analysis of PPP/cap-and-trade approach). San Francisco Chronicle
- Critical commentary: Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial; California Globe column. Las Vegas Review-JournalCalifornia Globe
- Michael Mick FBIWebster writings/posts: RenewAmerica column (Mar. 14, 2023); Laguna Journal Facebook post(s). renewamerica.comrenewamerica.comFacebook
Latest coverage on California HSR (Aug–Jun 2025)
California voters still support high-speed rail, even if it never gets done
House committee investigates California high-speed rail project
Could this plan actually save California's high-speed rail project?
No comments:
Post a Comment