The benefits of an offshore trust—particularly through our current program—are unmatched. Thanks to my recent affiliation, I can now offer you access to what is widely considered the most sophisticated, legally sound asset protection structure available today—superior to any domestic LLC, asset protection, or U.S. trust arrangement.
One of the most compelling advantages lies in the jurisdiction itself. In the Cook Islands, the legal framework is crystal clear, especially on the matter of “present” versus “future” creditors. Section 13B of the International Trusts Act 1984leaves no ambiguity on how such issues are handled—offering clarity and strength where U.S. laws often create confusion or grey areas.
While our U.S. colleagues may continue to interpret the implications of cases like Kilker v. Stillman, the Cook Islands remains the gold standard in asset protection. Its strong and consistent judicial precedent has continuously upheld the integrity of its trust laws, ensuring that clients’ interests are properly shielded.
Perhaps most importantly: U.S. judges retain jurisdiction over domestic trusts and trustees—but not over foreign trusts, foreign trustees, or offshore financial institutions with no U.S. affiliations. That’s a critical distinction. Time and again, we’ve seen that a properly structured offshore asset protection trust in the right jurisdiction simply performs better—especially when push comes to shove.
Scott, we are standing by to assemble your personal offshore asset protection program. Everything is in place—we just need your go-ahead to move forward. Time is of the essence in matters of asset protection, especially in today’s uncertain climate.
Please let me know when you're ready to begin. I look forward to working with you to secure your future.
Warm regards,
Mick Webster
Business Consultant | Asset Protection Specialist
Mobile 949 697-5676
Mvwsr@aol.com through our current program—are unmatched. Thanks to my recent affiliation, I can now offer you access to what is widely considered the most sophisticated, legally sound asset protection structure available today—superior to any domestic LLC, asset protection, or U.S. trust arrangement.
One of the most compelling advantages lies in the jurisdiction itself. In the Cook Islands, the legal framework is crystal clear, especially on the matter of “present” versus “future” creditors. Section 13B of the International Trusts Act 1984leaves no ambiguity on how such issues are handled—offering clarity and strength where U.S. laws often create confusion or grey areas.
While our U.S. colleagues may continue to interpret the implications of cases like Kilker v. Stillman, the Cook Islands remains the gold standard in asset protection. Its strong and consistent judicial precedent has continuously upheld the integrity of its trust laws, ensuring that clients’ interests are properly shielded.
Perhaps most importantly: U.S. judges retain jurisdiction over domestic trusts and trustees—but not over foreign trusts, foreign trustees, or offshore financial institutions with no U.S. affiliations. That’s a critical distinction. Time and again, we’ve seen that a properly structured offshore asset protection trust in the right jurisdiction simply performs better—especially when push comes to shove.
Scott, we are standing by to assemble your personal offshore asset protection program. Everything is in place—we just need your go-ahead to move forward. Time is of the essence in matters of asset protection, especially in today’s uncertain climate.
Please let me know when you're ready to begin. I look forward to working with you to secure your future.
Warm regards,
Mick Webster
Business Consultant | Asset Protection Specialist
Mobile 949 697-5676
Mvwsr@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment